Understand
A decision model turns a focused input into a structured category, rating, or probability that your workflow can inspect.
Learn
Start with a decision your team already reviews.
How Cyclotron learns
Reviewer corrections can help improve future AI decisions when a team evaluates the proposed change.
Publish or reject. Escalate or close. Include or leave out. Cyclotron records a reviewer correction, tests a proposed change, and uses accepted evidence to guide later decisions.
This recorded editorial example starts with a story and a publish-or-reject decision. An editor checks it. The correction stays visible, so the next version can be evaluated instead of assumed better.
See how it worksExplore the loop on your own, or see optional services for help integrating and operating it in your product.
Last reviewed:
Follow the loop
From an input to a better-informed next decision.
1
Give the model one jobFor each item, make a focused, inspectable call such as publish or reject. Keep the input and decision visible.2
Let a person correct itWhen a reviewer disagrees, the correction records the standard in use. A correction is evidence, not an automatic improvement.3
Evaluate before less reviewTest a proposed change on held-out, representative examples. Agree which errors still need people.
Go deeper
Choose the next question for your task.
Once you see the loop, use these guides to understand a decision model, inspect its evidence, compare models and cost, or plan ongoing review.
Understand
See how reviewer corrections can help a decision system learn your team’s standards, and decide whether a task is a good fit.
Evaluate
Choose useful measures, check confidence against outcomes, and test the effects of the complete workflow.
Evaluate
On the same 400 editorial items, Jev matched two general LLMs on accuracy, at a hundredth of the cost, and its mistakes were easier to route to a reviewer.
Set up
The first setup takes many small decisions. Once they are right, the loop steers itself. Set wrong, it steers itself just as confidently the wrong way.
Operate
Decide who can approve changes, what needs human review, and how your team will investigate mistakes.
See the decisions in practice on the use cases page. Each one says how we know.
Research and evidence
Inspect the evidence behind the guidance.
The research articles explain the experiments behind this guidance, including their methods and limits.
Choose your next step